<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for TurboFool (Neither, really)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.turbofool.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.turbofool.com</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of Jarrett Kaufman. The imitators shall pay.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:44:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Willy&#8211;wait, that&#8217;s not right&#8230; by TurboFool</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2010/03/29/free-willy-wait-thats-not-right/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>TurboFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=236#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Happy to, Luke. Thanks for the great piece and your other work which I&#039;m looking through now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy to, Luke. Thanks for the great piece and your other work which I&#8217;m looking through now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Willy&#8211;wait, that&#8217;s not right&#8230; by Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2010/03/29/free-willy-wait-thats-not-right/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=236#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Hi, 
This image is originally from my online comic: http://www.lukesurl.com/archives/1243/ . I would be grateful if you could include a link back to the source with this post.
Cheers,
Luke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
This image is originally from my online comic: <a href="http://www.lukesurl.com/archives/1243/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lukesurl.com/archives/1243/</a> . I would be grateful if you could include a link back to the source with this post.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Luke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Walking a fine line with Apple fans this week by TurboFool</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2011/10/07/walking-a-fine-line-with-apple-fans-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>TurboFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 21:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=330#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Your background is valid and accurate, Wendy, and it IS a lot of the history. My point is merely that Windows began to focus on picking up that slack and has succeeded, overall, just in different ways.

And as a side note, my Mac-only clients see me and need me just as often as my PC-only clients. When you troubleshoot the machines regularly you notice pretty much all the same problems, just in slightly different ways. Where it gets interesting is which ones are easy on one OS and frustratingly difficult to solve on the other. And that goes in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your background is valid and accurate, Wendy, and it IS a lot of the history. My point is merely that Windows began to focus on picking up that slack and has succeeded, overall, just in different ways.</p>
<p>And as a side note, my Mac-only clients see me and need me just as often as my PC-only clients. When you troubleshoot the machines regularly you notice pretty much all the same problems, just in slightly different ways. Where it gets interesting is which ones are easy on one OS and frustratingly difficult to solve on the other. And that goes in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Walking a fine line with Apple fans this week by Wendy H</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2011/10/07/walking-a-fine-line-with-apple-fans-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 20:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=330#comment-323</guid>
		<description>Here goes: How I became a mac user. Before the mid 1980s (were you even born yet then?) everyone I saw using computers had to know code. The IBM style room-size computer that was being used to record memberships at the nonprofit where I worked was new and groovy, and it was considered an exclusive and fancy privilege for the company to pay for training for the staff person who was going to operate it. (It wasn&#039;t me.) 
Some of the other people on the staff who had been training on other IBM style PCs would talk to me about how to &quot;back out&quot; of an application, or using the escape key any time they made a mistake. It all seemed so esoteric and slightly over my head. That was the environment of PCs at the time. I also knew about the entire floor of the department store where my husband worked on computer hardware, and my brother was a burster; the store paid for programmer training for my brother, and he&#039;s still a systems analyst. He told me about flow charts.
But - when my cousin and another friend bought the little 1984 original Macintosh, and my cousin showed me how to use the mouse to draw pictures on the quick draw program -- and I didn&#039;t need to know any of that colon backslash code language to do it -- I was in love. 
I went to work for a desktop publishing company, because I could type fast and accurately. Because of the Apple Macintosh, I could use a computer. It allowed ordinary people, not just the self confident elite who had either the money or luck to get training in  code and other skills to become programmers, to use email, to work in then-blossoming fields such as desktop publishing, and later to use powerful publishing and art programs that would have been very inaccessible if every user had to learn the basics first, instead of a few keyboard commands and the relationship between the mouse and the cursor. 
I had almost forgotten about the little 3 inch floppy disks. We had to use one application at a time. I entered text in MS Word - and the owner would do page layout in Adobe Pagemaker. Eventually he taught me how to do basic page layout; at that time we were still sending out for repro and doing a lot of paste up by hand -- now I think all of that is done with software.
I owe Apple a lot. I don&#039;t think I ever would have bothered to learn COBOL or even html - nor anything in between -- and I can&#039;t imagine my life now without email or the internet. Sure, you had to teach me Twitter, and I still am kind of a Luddite about some issues, but I don&#039;t have to be a mechanic to drive a car. And I think that&#039;s what Apple did differently early on that made it the darling of the generation that didn&#039;t grow up with computers, but who wanted to use them; Apple gave us the chance to do it effortlessly. 
I&#039;ve used some PCs (I agree, the mac is a Personal Computer, too) -- at work, and Windows makes it &quot;almost like a mac,&quot; but what I noticed is that they seemed to need the repairman almost weekly. Maybe it was the users, I&#039;ll never know. I have the same sensation of &quot;coming home&quot; familiarity with my own laptop; I appreciate your perspective, and I do not look down on anyone for the computer they use. I look down on certain people for other reasons, usually because I&#039;m taller :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here goes: How I became a mac user. Before the mid 1980s (were you even born yet then?) everyone I saw using computers had to know code. The IBM style room-size computer that was being used to record memberships at the nonprofit where I worked was new and groovy, and it was considered an exclusive and fancy privilege for the company to pay for training for the staff person who was going to operate it. (It wasn&#8217;t me.)<br />
Some of the other people on the staff who had been training on other IBM style PCs would talk to me about how to &#8220;back out&#8221; of an application, or using the escape key any time they made a mistake. It all seemed so esoteric and slightly over my head. That was the environment of PCs at the time. I also knew about the entire floor of the department store where my husband worked on computer hardware, and my brother was a burster; the store paid for programmer training for my brother, and he&#8217;s still a systems analyst. He told me about flow charts.<br />
But &#8211; when my cousin and another friend bought the little 1984 original Macintosh, and my cousin showed me how to use the mouse to draw pictures on the quick draw program &#8212; and I didn&#8217;t need to know any of that colon backslash code language to do it &#8212; I was in love.<br />
I went to work for a desktop publishing company, because I could type fast and accurately. Because of the Apple Macintosh, I could use a computer. It allowed ordinary people, not just the self confident elite who had either the money or luck to get training in  code and other skills to become programmers, to use email, to work in then-blossoming fields such as desktop publishing, and later to use powerful publishing and art programs that would have been very inaccessible if every user had to learn the basics first, instead of a few keyboard commands and the relationship between the mouse and the cursor.<br />
I had almost forgotten about the little 3 inch floppy disks. We had to use one application at a time. I entered text in MS Word &#8211; and the owner would do page layout in Adobe Pagemaker. Eventually he taught me how to do basic page layout; at that time we were still sending out for repro and doing a lot of paste up by hand &#8212; now I think all of that is done with software.<br />
I owe Apple a lot. I don&#8217;t think I ever would have bothered to learn COBOL or even html &#8211; nor anything in between &#8212; and I can&#8217;t imagine my life now without email or the internet. Sure, you had to teach me Twitter, and I still am kind of a Luddite about some issues, but I don&#8217;t have to be a mechanic to drive a car. And I think that&#8217;s what Apple did differently early on that made it the darling of the generation that didn&#8217;t grow up with computers, but who wanted to use them; Apple gave us the chance to do it effortlessly.<br />
I&#8217;ve used some PCs (I agree, the mac is a Personal Computer, too) &#8212; at work, and Windows makes it &#8220;almost like a mac,&#8221; but what I noticed is that they seemed to need the repairman almost weekly. Maybe it was the users, I&#8217;ll never know. I have the same sensation of &#8220;coming home&#8221; familiarity with my own laptop; I appreciate your perspective, and I do not look down on anyone for the computer they use. I look down on certain people for other reasons, usually because I&#8217;m taller <img src='http://www.turbofool.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Walking a fine line with Apple fans this week by TurboFool</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2011/10/07/walking-a-fine-line-with-apple-fans-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>TurboFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=330#comment-321</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s fair, and you were one of the Mac users who never bothered me. The moment I saw you running Chrome on your Mac I knew I had no beef with you. There are plenty of fair and reasonable reasons to like Macs, and I concede many of them. During the time I have spent with Macs I frequently find features or design elements here or there that I really appreciate, and wish were handled that well on Windows. I have no problem seeing why some people prefer them.

But while I agree that that bias WAS there against you guys, and I can&#039;t argue against your experience that it&#039;s still there, in the world I live, it seems to be the Mac users that have taken over in looking down upon the rest of us. They&#039;re the educated elite, and we&#039;re the unwashed masses who need to open our eyes, stop being &quot;sheeple&quot; and convert. Macs are now cool, the marketing that they&#039;re &quot;simply better&quot; is just accepted, and the belief is rampant that everyone else just needs to catch up. But I assume the physical culture one&#039;s in heavily influences this, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s fair, and you were one of the Mac users who never bothered me. The moment I saw you running Chrome on your Mac I knew I had no beef with you. There are plenty of fair and reasonable reasons to like Macs, and I concede many of them. During the time I have spent with Macs I frequently find features or design elements here or there that I really appreciate, and wish were handled that well on Windows. I have no problem seeing why some people prefer them.</p>
<p>But while I agree that that bias WAS there against you guys, and I can&#8217;t argue against your experience that it&#8217;s still there, in the world I live, it seems to be the Mac users that have taken over in looking down upon the rest of us. They&#8217;re the educated elite, and we&#8217;re the unwashed masses who need to open our eyes, stop being &#8220;sheeple&#8221; and convert. Macs are now cool, the marketing that they&#8217;re &#8220;simply better&#8221; is just accepted, and the belief is rampant that everyone else just needs to catch up. But I assume the physical culture one&#8217;s in heavily influences this, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Walking a fine line with Apple fans this week by ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2011/10/07/walking-a-fine-line-with-apple-fans-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 12:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=330#comment-320</guid>
		<description>I agree mostly. But you have to remember these are people who&#039;ve had to justify their use of macs for years when it wasn&#039;t cool, when most of the world thought macs were lame. The bias may not be as strong now, but even now I have to deal with my dad just not understanding why anyone would own one of those goofy liberal hippie machines. Hell, I dont like being accused of fanboying (not by you) because I like my computer and it was the best tool for the job. I don&#039;t like how much software I can&#039;t use because companies still refuse to make mac versions. I don&#039;t like how I&#039;m automatically branded as not tech savvy or told of course I like macs, I&#039;m a girl. Or that appreciating the design makes me stupid or a hipster. And yes a lot of this from people who would never even try a mac. There are plenty of Apple haters out there, because people will find any reason to make it us versus them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree mostly. But you have to remember these are people who&#8217;ve had to justify their use of macs for years when it wasn&#8217;t cool, when most of the world thought macs were lame. The bias may not be as strong now, but even now I have to deal with my dad just not understanding why anyone would own one of those goofy liberal hippie machines. Hell, I dont like being accused of fanboying (not by you) because I like my computer and it was the best tool for the job. I don&#8217;t like how much software I can&#8217;t use because companies still refuse to make mac versions. I don&#8217;t like how I&#8217;m automatically branded as not tech savvy or told of course I like macs, I&#8217;m a girl. Or that appreciating the design makes me stupid or a hipster. And yes a lot of this from people who would never even try a mac. There are plenty of Apple haters out there, because people will find any reason to make it us versus them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Regen Traynor Paranormal Challenge &#8211; Results by Interesting Links, February 2010 &#124; An Eclectic Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2010/02/21/regen-traynor-paranormal-challenge-results/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting Links, February 2010 &#124; An Eclectic Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=218#comment-248</guid>
		<description>[...] Regen Traynor Paranormal Challenge &#8211; Results &#8211; An interesting look at the workings of the IIG during a recent paranormal challenge. On TurboFool. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Regen Traynor Paranormal Challenge &ndash; Results &#8211; An interesting look at the workings of the IIG during a recent paranormal challenge. On TurboFool. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I Don&#8217;t Call Myself Agnostic by Anna Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2009/12/28/why-i-dont-call-myself-agnostic/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=175#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Great article!  I think it&#039;s fair, and very logical.  With one very small, but important flaw... there IS A falsifiable detail in the story of the tackliot.  There are not billions of people testifying to feeling his presence in their lives, every single day,

Now this is not evidence if its existence, granted, but to those are feeling the &quot;presence&quot; no other evidence is needed.  And there are fabulous scientific contributions to the explanation of what exactly people are feeling that they describe as &quot;God.&quot;  There&#039;s right temporal lobe disorder, stimulation of areas of the brain that mimic the &quot;Third Man Factor&quot; (a book with the same name describes this phenomenon at length), there are drugs that bring on mystical experiences, i.e., visions, etc... so yes, science can bring doubt because there are explanations to the physical sensations that pass for &quot;God&#039;s presence.&quot;

Where it gets weird though, and again, this is not proof to a non-believer,  (in fact, some believers don&#039;t even believe these things - see Cathechism of the Catholic Church) is when these phenomena occur with no prodding, no prior religiousity in the subject, no religious knowledge, no desire for them, no drugs, no disorders, no stress, no death (for the sake of near death experience arguments), etc.  

The spontaneity of mystical/religious experiences and the information that comes with them (see gnosis) is what keeps belief going.  Why?  Because the experience is so incredibly overwhelming, and it deals with something so completely *other* and powerful that it can&#039;t be ignored or denied.

Documentation of these experiences exists from time immemorial, but if someone has never experienced it, it is just ignored or written off as a hallucination and left at that.  Where what *should* be happening, is study of the phenomenon.  Thankfully, there are scientists finally on this bandwagon (see Neurotheology).

If there were millions of people (and there really are this many having sensations and visions of what they claim to be God) every year actually *seeing* or feeling the presence of the tackliot, well, you can imagine the difficulty in excising it from the population.

The experience/perception/sensation of &quot;God&quot; is self-reinforcing.  It is more pleasurable than any man-made drug, idea, sexual experience, anything.  Logic cannot *even begin* to compare to the feeling of it.  And yet there are people that pause to find scientific explanations for it.  Keep in mind though, that being and staying skeptical in the face of such an experience is *not* proof that God goes *not* exist...there is free will...or so the story goes.  Absence of proof, is not proof of absence.

But it is absolutely reasonable, and understandable, that those that have never felt a single sensation argue against a &quot;God,&quot; or tackliot.

As an aside, my speech of &quot;God&quot; here, does not refer to any particular god.  It speaks of a God that may have a completely different make-up and purpose (if any at all) than purported via the Bible, or any other holy book.   Individual facts within the Bible or Qur&#039;an are verifiable, and able to be scientifically disproven,  once that occurs they should be discarded.  

But the instinct to believe in something greater than ourselves is never going to go away so long as people get random firings of neurons that reinforce a supernatural presence. Most people just aren&#039;t strong enough to resist it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!  I think it&#8217;s fair, and very logical.  With one very small, but important flaw&#8230; there IS A falsifiable detail in the story of the tackliot.  There are not billions of people testifying to feeling his presence in their lives, every single day,</p>
<p>Now this is not evidence if its existence, granted, but to those are feeling the &#8220;presence&#8221; no other evidence is needed.  And there are fabulous scientific contributions to the explanation of what exactly people are feeling that they describe as &#8220;God.&#8221;  There&#8217;s right temporal lobe disorder, stimulation of areas of the brain that mimic the &#8220;Third Man Factor&#8221; (a book with the same name describes this phenomenon at length), there are drugs that bring on mystical experiences, i.e., visions, etc&#8230; so yes, science can bring doubt because there are explanations to the physical sensations that pass for &#8220;God&#8217;s presence.&#8221;</p>
<p>Where it gets weird though, and again, this is not proof to a non-believer,  (in fact, some believers don&#8217;t even believe these things &#8211; see Cathechism of the Catholic Church) is when these phenomena occur with no prodding, no prior religiousity in the subject, no religious knowledge, no desire for them, no drugs, no disorders, no stress, no death (for the sake of near death experience arguments), etc.  </p>
<p>The spontaneity of mystical/religious experiences and the information that comes with them (see gnosis) is what keeps belief going.  Why?  Because the experience is so incredibly overwhelming, and it deals with something so completely *other* and powerful that it can&#8217;t be ignored or denied.</p>
<p>Documentation of these experiences exists from time immemorial, but if someone has never experienced it, it is just ignored or written off as a hallucination and left at that.  Where what *should* be happening, is study of the phenomenon.  Thankfully, there are scientists finally on this bandwagon (see Neurotheology).</p>
<p>If there were millions of people (and there really are this many having sensations and visions of what they claim to be God) every year actually *seeing* or feeling the presence of the tackliot, well, you can imagine the difficulty in excising it from the population.</p>
<p>The experience/perception/sensation of &#8220;God&#8221; is self-reinforcing.  It is more pleasurable than any man-made drug, idea, sexual experience, anything.  Logic cannot *even begin* to compare to the feeling of it.  And yet there are people that pause to find scientific explanations for it.  Keep in mind though, that being and staying skeptical in the face of such an experience is *not* proof that God goes *not* exist&#8230;there is free will&#8230;or so the story goes.  Absence of proof, is not proof of absence.</p>
<p>But it is absolutely reasonable, and understandable, that those that have never felt a single sensation argue against a &#8220;God,&#8221; or tackliot.</p>
<p>As an aside, my speech of &#8220;God&#8221; here, does not refer to any particular god.  It speaks of a God that may have a completely different make-up and purpose (if any at all) than purported via the Bible, or any other holy book.   Individual facts within the Bible or Qur&#8217;an are verifiable, and able to be scientifically disproven,  once that occurs they should be discarded.  </p>
<p>But the instinct to believe in something greater than ourselves is never going to go away so long as people get random firings of neurons that reinforce a supernatural presence. Most people just aren&#8217;t strong enough to resist it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I hate Android by TurboFool</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2011/02/24/why-i-hate-android/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>TurboFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 05:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/2011/02/24/why-i-hate-android/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Well, you touched on something important: You&#039;re running CyanogenMod 7 which is, as far as I&#039;m aware, the ONLY build of Android that fixes my audio complaint. The official versions don&#039;t, and no manufacturers or carriers have bothered to fix it. As for why someone wouldn&#039;t run CyanogenMod 7, you are aware that it&#039;s not available for every Android phone, right? For instance, the Epic 4G is unsupported by it, and that&#039;s the phone I own. Kind of a sticking point against using it.

But as for my issue, you&#039;re likely perplexed by it because you&#039;re not running a ROM that has the problem, so can&#039;t recognize just how excessively problematic it is. I&#039;m not running several media files at a time (not sure what makes you think I am); my complaint is ONLY over notifications interrupting. But during the middle of a workday I might get work email notifications, personal email notifications, text messages, and who knows what else anywhere from a few times an hour to a few times a MINUTE. When listening to a podcast (also BeyondPod, which does NOT pause the audio but mutes at least part of it) or music this completely ruins the experience. And while I can mute the phone, I then lack awareness of potentially important messages. You have different notification needs/desires which also account for you being less aware of this issue.

My main point, though, is that this should be easy to resolve officially in a way that makes everyone happy. If it&#039;s not an issue for the two main competing OSes, there&#039;s no reason for Google to have ignored it so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you touched on something important: You&#8217;re running CyanogenMod 7 which is, as far as I&#8217;m aware, the ONLY build of Android that fixes my audio complaint. The official versions don&#8217;t, and no manufacturers or carriers have bothered to fix it. As for why someone wouldn&#8217;t run CyanogenMod 7, you are aware that it&#8217;s not available for every Android phone, right? For instance, the Epic 4G is unsupported by it, and that&#8217;s the phone I own. Kind of a sticking point against using it.</p>
<p>But as for my issue, you&#8217;re likely perplexed by it because you&#8217;re not running a ROM that has the problem, so can&#8217;t recognize just how excessively problematic it is. I&#8217;m not running several media files at a time (not sure what makes you think I am); my complaint is ONLY over notifications interrupting. But during the middle of a workday I might get work email notifications, personal email notifications, text messages, and who knows what else anywhere from a few times an hour to a few times a MINUTE. When listening to a podcast (also BeyondPod, which does NOT pause the audio but mutes at least part of it) or music this completely ruins the experience. And while I can mute the phone, I then lack awareness of potentially important messages. You have different notification needs/desires which also account for you being less aware of this issue.</p>
<p>My main point, though, is that this should be easy to resolve officially in a way that makes everyone happy. If it&#8217;s not an issue for the two main competing OSes, there&#8217;s no reason for Google to have ignored it so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I hate Android by Mangraa</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2011/02/24/why-i-hate-android/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Mangraa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 04:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/2011/02/24/why-i-hate-android/#comment-181</guid>
		<description>... Hmm... Personally, I love the Android OS, but I&#039;m not one who really cares that much about audio/video on it (mainly I don&#039;t care about video; audio I use in spades).  So yes, I agree that improvements probably could be made in that area, I guess.  I&#039;m not the one to ask though, since I don&#039;t really use anything but one audio source at a time for the most part.  I detest &quot;voice assisted&quot; GPS, and that&#039;s about the only conflict I can think of that I&#039;ve ever experienced.  
Which is odd, because I don&#039;t believe I have the same issues that you do.  My music files and BeyondPod playbacks all _pause_ on things like incoming calls, and my GPS talks over the currently playing media; it doesn&#039;t interrupt it at all.  Same with notifications- they play over the media file, they don&#039;t interrupt it.  2.2/2.3, both stock (rooted) and Cyanogen 7 (which I&#039;m avoiding talking about exclusively since it isn&#039;t stock, but I don&#039;t really see why anyone WOULDN&#039;T run Cyanogen)

I hate the iPhone for a lot of reasons, mainly that its popularity only validates my observation that people are retarded and buy whatever is trendy over whatever is functionally better.  But another reason is that the iPhone is the smart phone for everyone, especially dumb people.  And kids.  the iPhone was built like a toy, and while it does games well and all that stuff, I don&#039;t care about that.  I want my phone to actually _do_ stuff I want it to do that it _can_ do...which is to say, I care about actual apps and productivity and internet-based non-entertainment applications.  And especially now, Android-based hardware has almost caught up with the iPhone in terms of gaming and stuff. If I wanted to do all that gaming and video stuff I could, but it&#039;s nice having the option, as opposed to the iPhone&#039;s North Korean-like restrictions on everything.

The bluetooth issue, however, IS one of my biggest gripes as well.  It&#039;s something which is so annoying and affects SO many people, it&#039;s not like they missed it.  There&#039;s ways to sort of work around it, but that shouldn&#039;t be necessary.

I&#039;m still perplexed by what seems to be a constant occurrence of interrupted audio with your phone, though.  I rarely get that, but it seems like it&#039;s plaguing your device for some reason.  Quite odd, but I don&#039;t know what else one might have going at the same time beyond 1 media file, intermittent GPS speech (which is fucking irritating so mute the shit) and intermittent notification sounds (again, most of mine are off, since I can just look at the screen and do so often).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; Hmm&#8230; Personally, I love the Android OS, but I&#8217;m not one who really cares that much about audio/video on it (mainly I don&#8217;t care about video; audio I use in spades).  So yes, I agree that improvements probably could be made in that area, I guess.  I&#8217;m not the one to ask though, since I don&#8217;t really use anything but one audio source at a time for the most part.  I detest &#8220;voice assisted&#8221; GPS, and that&#8217;s about the only conflict I can think of that I&#8217;ve ever experienced.<br />
Which is odd, because I don&#8217;t believe I have the same issues that you do.  My music files and BeyondPod playbacks all _pause_ on things like incoming calls, and my GPS talks over the currently playing media; it doesn&#8217;t interrupt it at all.  Same with notifications- they play over the media file, they don&#8217;t interrupt it.  2.2/2.3, both stock (rooted) and Cyanogen 7 (which I&#8217;m avoiding talking about exclusively since it isn&#8217;t stock, but I don&#8217;t really see why anyone WOULDN&#8217;T run Cyanogen)</p>
<p>I hate the iPhone for a lot of reasons, mainly that its popularity only validates my observation that people are retarded and buy whatever is trendy over whatever is functionally better.  But another reason is that the iPhone is the smart phone for everyone, especially dumb people.  And kids.  the iPhone was built like a toy, and while it does games well and all that stuff, I don&#8217;t care about that.  I want my phone to actually _do_ stuff I want it to do that it _can_ do&#8230;which is to say, I care about actual apps and productivity and internet-based non-entertainment applications.  And especially now, Android-based hardware has almost caught up with the iPhone in terms of gaming and stuff. If I wanted to do all that gaming and video stuff I could, but it&#8217;s nice having the option, as opposed to the iPhone&#8217;s North Korean-like restrictions on everything.</p>
<p>The bluetooth issue, however, IS one of my biggest gripes as well.  It&#8217;s something which is so annoying and affects SO many people, it&#8217;s not like they missed it.  There&#8217;s ways to sort of work around it, but that shouldn&#8217;t be necessary.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still perplexed by what seems to be a constant occurrence of interrupted audio with your phone, though.  I rarely get that, but it seems like it&#8217;s plaguing your device for some reason.  Quite odd, but I don&#8217;t know what else one might have going at the same time beyond 1 media file, intermittent GPS speech (which is fucking irritating so mute the shit) and intermittent notification sounds (again, most of mine are off, since I can just look at the screen and do so often).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mr. Deity and the Matter by Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2011/01/24/mr-deity-and-the-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=283#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Great performance, as always.  Nice to finally have you back on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great performance, as always.  Nice to finally have you back on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creativity, distraction, and impatience by Adrienne</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2010/10/31/creativity-distraction-and-impatience/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=279#comment-140</guid>
		<description>In a way you are in fact dodging something that is admittedly excruciating at times. I&#039;ve tried it a few times and ultimately resigned myself to analyzing and speculating on creative things rather than trying to take part in the creation itself. 

The way I see it, you can write your own melody or improvise on one that already exists. Either way you&#039;re contributing something unique and valuable. 

Besides, someone has to provide commentary on said creativity, n&#039;est-ce pas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a way you are in fact dodging something that is admittedly excruciating at times. I&#8217;ve tried it a few times and ultimately resigned myself to analyzing and speculating on creative things rather than trying to take part in the creation itself. </p>
<p>The way I see it, you can write your own melody or improvise on one that already exists. Either way you&#8217;re contributing something unique and valuable. </p>
<p>Besides, someone has to provide commentary on said creativity, n&#8217;est-ce pas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How open is your mind? by tbrown92030</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2010/09/25/how-open-is-your-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>tbrown92030</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=275#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Some very good points.  

I would liken the individual that is always willing to keep opening the box to one that never learns.  The process of &quot;closing one&#039;s mind&quot; to the increasingly improbable is, perhaps, nothing more than the process of learning.

For those &quot;fully open minded&quot; people being really close minded; it&#039;s so true.  The specific thing they are close minded about is that it is possible to prune back the forest of possibilities as information becomes available.  That is, not all things are equally probable and the refusal to see that is simply being close minded about that.

It is frustrating to debate with these people as they insist they are the ones with open minds and that we are the ones that need to &quot;think outside the box&quot; in order to see the &quot;higher truth!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some very good points.  </p>
<p>I would liken the individual that is always willing to keep opening the box to one that never learns.  The process of &#8220;closing one&#8217;s mind&#8221; to the increasingly improbable is, perhaps, nothing more than the process of learning.</p>
<p>For those &#8220;fully open minded&#8221; people being really close minded; it&#8217;s so true.  The specific thing they are close minded about is that it is possible to prune back the forest of possibilities as information becomes available.  That is, not all things are equally probable and the refusal to see that is simply being close minded about that.</p>
<p>It is frustrating to debate with these people as they insist they are the ones with open minds and that we are the ones that need to &#8220;think outside the box&#8221; in order to see the &#8220;higher truth!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dishonest, ignorant, or does it matter? by TurboFool</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2010/05/22/dishonest-ignorant-or-does-it-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>TurboFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 02:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=261#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Fascinating. Would you like to expand upon that thought-provoking comment, possibly with a reason for your viewpoint, or merely let it stand in its current vacuous form?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating. Would you like to expand upon that thought-provoking comment, possibly with a reason for your viewpoint, or merely let it stand in its current vacuous form?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dishonest, ignorant, or does it matter? by whatever</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2010/05/22/dishonest-ignorant-or-does-it-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 02:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=261#comment-121</guid>
		<description>wow you are really an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow you are really an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flamebaiting as a marketing strategy? by Tweets that mention TurboFool (Neither, really) » Blog Archive » Flamebaiting as a marketing strategy? -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2010/05/12/flamebaiting-as-a-marketing-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention TurboFool (Neither, really) » Blog Archive » Flamebaiting as a marketing strategy? -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=251#comment-120</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jarrett Kaufman. Jarrett Kaufman said: The post in which TurboFool rambles about flamebaiting as a marketing strategy: http://bit.ly/amhIlO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jarrett Kaufman. Jarrett Kaufman said: The post in which TurboFool rambles about flamebaiting as a marketing strategy: <a href="http://bit.ly/amhIlO" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/amhIlO</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fuck the Motherfucker (sorry) by Tweets that mention TurboFool (Neither, really) » Blog Archive » Fuck the Motherfucker (sorry) -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2010/04/29/fuck-the-motherfucker-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention TurboFool (Neither, really) » Blog Archive » Fuck the Motherfucker (sorry) -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 06:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=247#comment-119</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jarrett Kaufman. Jarrett Kaufman said: Tim Minchin&#039;s new video and me swearing a lot about the motherfucking Pope: http://is.gd/bO44F [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jarrett Kaufman. Jarrett Kaufman said: Tim Minchin&#39;s new video and me swearing a lot about the motherfucking Pope: <a href="http://is.gd/bO44F" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/bO44F</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Regen Traynor Paranormal Challenge &#8211; Results by An Eclectic Mind &#187; Interesting Links, February 22, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2010/02/21/regen-traynor-paranormal-challenge-results/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>An Eclectic Mind &#187; Interesting Links, February 22, 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=218#comment-110</guid>
		<description>[...] Regen Traynor Paranormal Challenge &#8211; Results &#8211; An interesting look at the workings of the IIG during a recent paranormal challenge. On TurboFool. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Regen Traynor Paranormal Challenge &ndash; Results &#8211; An interesting look at the workings of the IIG during a recent paranormal challenge. On TurboFool. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Regen Traynor Paranormal Challenge &#8211; Results by karen</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2010/02/21/regen-traynor-paranormal-challenge-results/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=218#comment-109</guid>
		<description>thanks for a fun play by play of the day. good writing! i had to miss it, and you helped me &quot;be there&quot;.
regards,
karen, wife of brian hart, the webcaster of the event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for a fun play by play of the day. good writing! i had to miss it, and you helped me &#8220;be there&#8221;.<br />
regards,<br />
karen, wife of brian hart, the webcaster of the event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Regen Traynor Paranormal Challenge &#8211; Results by TurboFool</title>
		<link>http://www.turbofool.com/2010/02/21/regen-traynor-paranormal-challenge-results/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>TurboFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbofool.com/?p=218#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting and your interest. I also spent quite some time envious of the people who got to work with these groups. Honestly, I had no realization that some of these people were mere miles from me, doing the very work I read about and listened to on podcasts and watched on television. As well, I felt the typical trepidation many people feel about getting involved in something new with established players. The actual people in the group immediately shattered any concerns I had about this. It truly is a deeply welcoming crowd.

As for your involvement, I did a cursory Google search and saw an Arizona Skeptics group on Facebook, as well as some others. It might be worth your time to seek them out and take the plunge. The reality of this field is that every individual member is important regardless of where they are or who they&#039;re working with. The IIG was quite diverse, and made up of people I would never have assumed were skeptics, or never assumed were the type to get up and make a difference. And yet they were intricately involved in doing just that. So find a way if you can. You&#039;ll feel darn good about it in the end, I assure you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting and your interest. I also spent quite some time envious of the people who got to work with these groups. Honestly, I had no realization that some of these people were mere miles from me, doing the very work I read about and listened to on podcasts and watched on television. As well, I felt the typical trepidation many people feel about getting involved in something new with established players. The actual people in the group immediately shattered any concerns I had about this. It truly is a deeply welcoming crowd.</p>
<p>As for your involvement, I did a cursory Google search and saw an Arizona Skeptics group on Facebook, as well as some others. It might be worth your time to seek them out and take the plunge. The reality of this field is that every individual member is important regardless of where they are or who they&#8217;re working with. The IIG was quite diverse, and made up of people I would never have assumed were skeptics, or never assumed were the type to get up and make a difference. And yet they were intricately involved in doing just that. So find a way if you can. You&#8217;ll feel darn good about it in the end, I assure you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

