Bo knows Charlie Sheen

It’s no secret I’m a huge fan of Bo Burnham, and I just finally got around to buying his latest album Words Words Words online. I played it three times on my commutes to and from various clients today and a few specific songs stood out, some of which are on YouTube. Since it’s been a while since I’ve done a proper Bo-fest on here, I thought I’d go ahead and link to a few.

The first one actually got the attention of the woman in the car next to me on Ventura Blvd. I noticed her looking at my car and gesturing, so I paused, rolled the window down the rest of the way, and she told me how funny what I was listening to was, allowing me the opportunity to pimp Bo Burnham to a complete stranger. It’s also strangely timely thanks to the Charlie Sheen situation (to which Bo just Tweeted this). I saw it online a month or so ago and felt it confirmed that Bo’s not just a guy who can write funny, random, shocking material, but is truly insightful. Enjoy:

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo9pU1q8sy8

More after the break…

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

YouTube Remote – An example of the future

No question one of the best parts of Android is its extensive app marketplace. On top of that, if you’re a fan of Google’s various services the integration it offers with them is extensive. From having your contacts available within seconds of first setting up your phone to having Google Maps remember your recent search history from your desktop, the connections are great. One place this ties in especially well is with YouTube.

ss-0-320-480-160-2-5e4bc14e6d6c83f703d7c95b99fdfeba7d39b28fNow of course Android ships with a solid YouTube app for viewing YouTube videos on your phone. It works beautifully, makes searching, accessing favorites, playlists, etc. easy, and it has a slick interface. But a few months back Google released an app called YouTube Remote that takes a different tact. Initially it appears quite similar in setup and layout, except it doesn’t actually play any videos—at least not on the phone. Instead you browse to YouTube.com/Leanback on your computer (preferably a HTPC) and make sure you’re logged in, then log into YouTube Remote with the same account. Suddenly you have Play/Pause/Skip Back/Skip Forward/Next/Previous buttons on your phone that control the video on the screen, you have access to your favorites, playlists, searches, and a queue so you can manage your entire experience from your phone.

Besides the portrait list view, if you tilt the phone to landscape you get full-screen controls overlaid on top of the video’s still and access to the Thumbs rating buttons and the ability to do most of the other things you’d want to do with a YouTube video besides simply watch it.

ss-1-320-480-160-2-f16ac65b78cd0622ecf8c6528667c9a7edc33507In my home a common activity when friends come over is for someone to remember this cool video they saw on YouTube and put it up on the TV. While that’s happening I’ll often think of another video we need to watch afterward, or someone else will shout out one we need to watch. With YouTube Remote, instead of having to remember these and search for them when the video’s over I can just search for them right on my phone, click the + button and add them to the queue so as soon as the current video’s over the next one starts. I can also reorder the search results or other lists, so if I’m on a Tim Minchin kick, or want to play some of Bo Burnham’s greatest hits I can just search for them, hit play, and then start reordering the search results without ever messing with my queue.

To me this represents a prime example of the future we’re living in. I’m using the slick, intuitive, touchscreen interface of my phone to control YouTube directly and have it push its contents to the computer on my TV. It’s so simple, it’s so easy, it’s so effortless, and I think it’s easily overlooked by most people as being exceptionally cool and sophisticated. Heck, I’m pretty sure few people have any awareness of this app, which is a shame.

What are the catches? Well, I think it’s arguably not that handy if you’re not on an HTPC, as directly using a keyboard and mouse are still easier options, minus the ability to add to the queue without interrupting the current video. Also if you get a text message or an email and go check it and the app manages to unload itself from memory, when you go back in it will completely overtake the current play session on the computer and start over with whatever video is at the top of the list it loads. I hope this gets fixed in a future version, as it’s about the only aspect of the setup that’s limited.

I hope to see better collaboration between devices of this type. There’s a lot of great syncing in place already, such as with Chrome automatically transferring EVERYTHING immediately upon logging in in a new location (including the Cr-48 netbook I was surprised with earlier this month), and there are great streaming options like Windows 7’s ability to stream my home music and video library to my notebook via Windows Media Player, or even using Remote Desktop to connect to my home computer from anywhere (including my phone). But it’s this type of instant communication between devices that genuinely enriches the experience and isn’t merely showing off that I’m excited about. I can’t wait to see more of it.

You can get YouTube Remote from the Android Market.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

I may be about to hate Charlie Sheen

I actually watch Two and a Half Men. I don’t care what others say, I do find it funny. Not brilliant, not hilarious, not deep, and not one of the all-time greats, and years from now I’ll probably only remember it as “that show that Charlie Sheen fucked up,” but I laugh just enough to keep up with it.

But I will be extremely pissed off if he gets the show canceled right now. Why? Because Monday night’s CBS line-up relies on it. And you know what else is in Monday night’s CBS line-up? How I Met Your Mother. This show’s chances of renewal each season have ranged from solid to being on the bubble each year, and it’s likely only the solid line-up that keeps it safe. CBS already moved The Big Bang Theory to Thursdays to spread the wealth, so it’s no longer got that as a safety. If Charlie Sheen manages to take down HIMYM, which is possibly the best three-camera on television today and WILL be remembered by me as one of the all-time greatest, I will upgrade him from laughable screw-up who still manages to be funny to pits of hell hatred. You have been warned, Charlie. Tread carefully.

Tagged , , , , , ,

Why I hate Android

Okay, first things first: that headline was pure sensationalism at its core. I love Android, and there are currently no alternatives to it that I would consider as reasonable replacements for everything Android does so damn well. But it’s very often the little things that can really frustrate you when dealing with a device or platform.

Case in point, Android’s handling of its multimedia duties. See, when Apple decided to get into the smartphone biz, they completely changed the paradigm of what we expected. Instead of a phone built around business needs that could also browse the web and play audio files, they started with an iPod and built around that. In fact that’s what led to many of the early jokes about the iPhone really just being an iPod that made phone calls. It was initially best at its roots and poor at everything else. It’s since improved drastically, although the joke that it’s terrible at making phone calls remains.

Meanwhile Android came from a more base concept of trying to do everything, and launched after the iPhone set the standard for these concepts. It, IMO, got the overall OS concept down much better, appreciating that we need to run more than one app at a time, that when something wants our attention it shouldn’t completely overtake the activity we’re participating in, and allowing applications to tie their needs together in all kinds of clever and involved ways. But what it lacked was the long history of multimedia experience to inform that functionality, and that’s where it still fails.

To be clear, Android’s built-in media abilities are fine. They do the job well, their interface is decent, and I have little need to complain about it. Some phones, such as the Galaxy S line, include support for a lot more codecs making it actually EASIER to play videos on my phone than on an iPhone (my Epic 4G has so far played every single video format I’ve thrown on its card, without conversion) or Zune, and include improved media players. As well the Android Market is packed with alternatives for better podcasting software than Google’s passable Listen app, better video players such as mVideoPlayer, better music apps such as DoubleTwist or WinAmp or a dozen others, streaming options like Slacker, etc. Point is, its flexibility allows it as a media device to functionally match or surpass the iPhone and Windows Phone 7 quite comfortably, even if not as fluidly or naturally. So it’s not in its technical abilities that Android fails me. It’s merely in one simple overlooked place: audio mixing.

Android seems, under most circumstances, unable to mix two disparate sources of audio into its output at the same time. When playing music, a video, streaming audio, playing a podcast, etc., any other audio playback that occurs (such as the variety of notifications your dozens of apps can use to get your attention, carefully customized to exactly your needs, or directions from your navigation software), the OS will simply kill whatever audio track was already playing for as long as it takes to play back the other audio (including any dead silence that was included in the clip before or after), and then continue playing the original line of audio. It doesn’t pause the audio, it merely mutes it. When playing back music this is unbelievably annoying and distracting, and when playing back an audio book or podcast it’s simply unforgiveable. The number of times I have to hit the skip back button in BeyondPod to see what I missed because an email came in while I was enjoying the latest Drabblecast is ridiculous, not to mention mildly unsafe. And even in music it leads me to avoid using Slacker or my other amazing music sources when I have guests in my car because it’s simply embarrassing to have the audio constantly shut down while we’re trying to enjoy ourselves. I find myself apologizing for it or simply shutting it off and switching to FM.

So far Google seems unconcerned with the issue despite the large number of complaints in their support sites about it. The problem’s existed throughout every version, and it doesn’t seem to be acknowledged. But it’s enough to make me consider digging out my Zune again just for audio, except it still fails to provide me the streaming options I’ve grown to expect since switching to Android.

Another smaller failing in this area is Android’s handling of Bluetooth when there’s an audio cable plugged into the device. It seems to assume that if I have anything plugged into the headphone jack that I must prefer to use that as my hands-free solution instead of the paired and connected Bluetooth headset. This might make sense if I were using the included headphones with microphone built in, but it’s a failed assumption when I’m in the car and have an audio cable plugged into my sound system. It’s even more of a failure since it doesn’t notice that my audio cable doesn’t have a line for microphone, can’t deliver audio to it, and doesn’t leave the phone’s built-in mic open. So when I’m driving and listening to music through my phone and I get a call, despite having my Bluetooth headset on and in my ear, I have to reach over and unplug the audio cable from my phone and then answer the call, otherwise I hear my caller through my car’s speakers and they hear nothing in response. The iPhone, as far as I’ve witnessed, actually asks you which device you want to answer through when a phone call comes in, routing to your Bluetooth or other options accordingly. Presumably if you were to hit the answer button ON your Bluetooth it would be smart enough to route there. Android still doesn’t do this.

These issues aren’t enough to override everything that I love about Android, but they are enough to cause some audible profanities in my car for reasons I don’t think are necessary. These SHOULD be easy to fix, as even Windows Mobile, for all its failings, worked fine in these circumstances. And yet, at least for now, they remain untouched. Google’s lack of concern on these types of matters seems to border almost on Apple’s methods of telling their users their desired features don’t matter, except Google instead simply ignores the problem entirely. It’s unfortunate, and I really hope it improves. While I’m sure there are other issues with Android that bug me, if these two problems were resolved I’d feel as close to 100% happy with it as I could in a technology world with a constantly moving target of expectations. Let’s shore this up and move on.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Mr. Deity and the Matter

Just a quick post since I have trouble getting the time to write the long ones anymore. The newest episode of Mr. Deity is up, and it marks my season 4 premiere, finally. Check it out and post your feedback:

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Creativity, distraction, and impatience

Occasionally I’m clever. Problem is it’s mostly spontaneous, short, and rarely useful. If I set out to do something clever or be clever I’m pretty much doomed to failure. But occasionally I stumble upon it.

A few years back (at least five) there was a post on the IGN Boards Vestibule (shudder) to post something completely nonsensical. I posted the following, which I wrote on the spot:

The earth really is flat, carried on the back of an octupus (of average size). The sun, which is also flat, actually revolves around the earth, flipping over at a rate of 1 googol per second. The moon (which, strangely enough, is round) is actually attached to the octupus by a giant string, and the octopus is using it as a yo-yo, but extremely slowly. The other planets are mostly illusions projected by the octopus’ older psychic brother, “sid” (not capitalized). The exception is Pluto which is, ironically, the home of Goofy, but, also ironically, this Goofy cannot talk. The planet, however, speaks in a thick, southern drawl.

Short, sweet, and arguably clever. I certainly thought so at the time, and elements of it capture my attention now. But what bugs me more is that I can rarely repeat anything of even this level, much less the exceptionally better writings that I’d love to create. Creativity astounds me, fascinates me, and earns my deepest respect. People who are creative fill me with awe, and I enjoy just basking in their existence. But inevitably I’m also left to some degree of jealousy, or at least envy.

I think my problem may simply be that I’m easily distracted and relatively impatient. I’m a perfectionist, and the catch with us is that if we can’t do something perfectly, we tend not to bother at all. When I start attempting to be creative and find myself not producing something up to my standards immediately, I walk away from it. What I completely ignore is that real authors, artists, etc. take weeks, months, or years to perfect their works, and I can only presume they all start with rough works that can’t possibly be up to their own standards. The problem is that knowing this doesn’t seem to help me. It doesn’t seem to put me on the right path. And worst of all, it doesn’t give me the idea with which to start. Perhaps that’s all I need is the kernel from which to work and I’ll have what I need.

Mmm… popcorn…

Tagged , , , , ,

How open is your mind?

I hear a lot of talk about open-mindedness. People pride themselves quite often on just how open their minds are, as though this is a great mental accomplishment and places their thought processes above those of the lesser minds who would close themselves off to the great possibilities of this universe. There are so many incredible possibilities out there that the poor, close-minded person can’t grasp or even accept as possibilities, and they’re left out of all the fun in which their open-minded friends and family get to participate. Such a sad life is that of the close-minded person.

But let’s examine for a moment what it really means to be open or close-minded, and the realities of each. I’m going to provide you with a simple thought experiment to see just how close-minded you are:

Sitting on my coffee table is a shoebox. Quite ordinary and plain, stripped of the price tags and such once adorning it, with the logo of some store brand shoe company. I point to the box and inform you that there is, in fact, a small rhinoceros in the box.

You’re snickering. Why? Don’t you have an open mind? Anything is possible, and who are you to decide that there can’t be a small rhinoceros in that shoebox? The universe is full of possibilities. Don’t you owe it to yourself to be open to this one and not miss out?

That’s better. I see you’ve come to your senses and remembered how open your mind is. Now that that’s corrected, why don’t you open the box and take a look at the rhinoceros. They’re really quite adorable at such a miniature scale.

What’s that? The box is empty? Oh, dear. Well, give it a minute and then open it up again. I’m sure it will be there this time, and it really is just too cute to miss out on.

What do you mean “that’s ridiculous?” Keep an open mind. Just because it wasn’t there a moment ago is no evidence that it won’t be there now. Remember: anything is possible.

I see your hesitation, but clearly you realize your dedication to open-mindedness must be preserved, and you open the box again only to find it empty.

How strange. I assure you it must be there. Why don’t you give it a few more minutes and then open it up again?

What? You refuse? You say there’s clearly no small rhinoceros in that shoebox and there’s never going to be? Tsk, tsk. You’re so close-minded.

There’s a progression between leaving your mind open to possibilities and finally closing it and moving it on. Somewhere between the two you have to cross a line where you decide that continuing to stay open to a possibility is simply irrational and absurd. For different people this line exists in different places. Some might have drawn that line with my first suggestion of a small rhino in a shoebox, rendering internally all the reasons this defies logic and reason, and refusing to so much as open the box. Another person might simply have taken the extra step of realizing there’s no harm in opening the box beyond being laughed at if I were merely playing a joke on them. Some even more rational people might run through the possible ways in which I might be using wordplay or omitting facts, suspecting I mean a toy rhino, or a drawing of a rhino, and opening the box to see such an object.

However I daresay that nearly all rational people, whether or not they pride themselves on open-mindedness, would close their minds to the rhino-in-the-box scenario upon opening it and confirming the lack of said rhino. It takes a very… special person to remain so dedicated to their open-mindedness that they would ignore this clear resolution to the question and continue down my path of assertions that it will reappear at any moment. And even the most extreme example I give in my scenario still gives up at some point and determines the rhino is a no-show, no matter how adorable I assure you it is.

Now the other end of the scale that I mentioned has a person refusing to so much as open the box. I would tend to agree that such a person would fit the definition of “close-minded” relatively well, as well as fuddy-duddy and a bore, as well as someone I’m rather confident I’ve never met. But the next step, the person who’s willing to open the box under the assumption that there’s a trick to be played, or a circumstance that he or she had not considered, seems to me quite open-minded indeed. This person recognizes the absurdity of the claim, but also recognizes their lack of clear knowledge of all of the circumstances surrounding the situation and is willing to entertain the possibility that their assumption, no matter how well-founded it is, could be wrong. Once the box is opened and their initial assumption is confirmed, though, they move on and waste no more time on the subject.

The point I’m trying to make here is that along the scale from closed-to-open minds, the people being accused of being close-minded are rarely actually so, while the people who pride themselves on open-minded are never as open-minded as they claim to be. There’s always a line that will change one from the other if you just search hard enough for it.

When it comes to scientific endeavors, the so-called close-minded use these exact same tactics. They’ll take a claim and test it. Oh, sure, the tests for most absurd claims are far, far more complex than merely peeking into a box, but the base principle is the same. They take the claim and they pass it through all the possible tests. Depending on the complexity or importance of the test, there may be far more interest, far more rigorous tests, and far more people involved. But the idea remains the same that it’s carefully tested. Sometimes these close-minded scientists get a surprise and find that there’s something to this that they might not initially have assumed was there. Other times the tests continually disprove the claim.

But this is where the so-called open minds step in and cry foul. This is where claims are made that those damned close-minded scientists merely don’t want to see the truth. They’re ignoring the possibilities that are out there and are just covering their ears and humming, while the enlightened folks with their open minds can see what’s really going on. And no amount of scientific testing, research, facts, figures, statistics, and proof will change the mind of that open-minded person. That’s right, the open-minded will not be moved, because they know the truth, and their wide-open minds will not be changed no matter what you close-minded researchers learned about the subject. Huh… strange how similar being incredibly open-minded is to being extremely close-minded when viewed from the other side, isn’t it?

There’s a phrase, recently popular thanks to Tim Minchin (although he’ll readily admit it’s not his): “If you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.” It’s funny, and while not literally true, it says a lot that comes close. When one opens their minds to all possibilities, and leaves it as wide open as possible, never narrowing the opening, never closing it for certain ideas that have played out their feasibility, never recognizing when something absurd has been sufficiently disproven, one loses all abilities to settle on any of reality. One loses the ability to look at something and recognize when it’s real, when it’s true, when it’s solid, when it can be believed, trusted, accepted, and relied upon. Everything becomes possible, and anything can be true and untrue, and you can’t settle down and move on. You get stuck and can no longer see the forest for the trees, the trees for the forest, or whether or not such things really exist.

Open-mindedness is wonderful, and it’s something that those of us who have been accused of not having it actually cherish. The ability and willingness to look at any possibility, examine it with as little bias as possible, test it, and reach a conclusion based on logic, reason, research, and the work of others gives us the ability to not only open our minds, but expand them with an endless array of facts and truths that turn us on to all of the very real possibilities of this world. But we must never close our minds off to the possibility that reality is just that, and some things aren’t possible, some things don’t happen, any dream we have isn’t the same as reality, and believing something against all evidence doesn’t make us open-minded, but close-minded to the only reality we have, and the endless possibilities it provides us if we just focus on them and stop blurring them with fantasy.

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

IIG 10th Anniversary Party recap

Saturday night was the party and awards ceremony celebrating the Independent Investigations Group‘s 10th anniversary.

The party consisted of food, drinks, cake, chatter, wonderful special guests, and awards. Some of the guests included well-known heavyweights like Michael Shermer and Brian Dunning, as well as friend/colleague/lord Brian Dalton (Mr. Deity), and esteemed experts such as Carol Tavris, Harriet Hall and Eugenie Scott. This list were all presented with awards from the IIG for their achievements in promoting science, skepticism, and critical thinking.

Also awarded that evening for their achievements and assistance within the IIG were fellow members Wendy Hughes, Dave Richards, and Ross Blocher. Wendy and Dave each have brought to the IIG some of its biggest and most valuable investigations throughout its history, and Ross has pulled excessive all-nighters in redesigning the group’s web site, designing brochures and business cards, and more.

Also awarded were staff from the productions of Eureka and The Mentalist. While both could be said to play a little loose with factual science (especially the former), BOTH shows promote science and critical thinking heavily as forces for good, progress, and solving problems. They cast these topics in a positive light and help the viewers see just what we can accomplish when we focus on these topics. These two shows received the IIG’s special new SurlyRamics trophy designed by Amy Roth of Skepchick, which was truly beautiful and unique to our group.

The ceremony went smoothly and kept the attention of the crowd of over 100 people, many of whom were visiting the CFI or an IIG event for the first time, and all of whom seemed to leave with an extremely positive impression of our group and what we can achieve with little more than dedication and volunteer efforts.

I think it’s clear that after this weekend the IIG can expect to continue to steadily climb in its influence on critical thinking and skepticism. We’re branching out with affiliates across the country, and our own group has major efforts underway including our in-depth Power Balance investigation plans, The Odds Must Be Crazy web site, further efforts into the California Board of Registered Nurses reform, and much more that we’re not yet ready to talk about.

TAM8 left me with a lot of pride for the IIG’s place in the grand scheme and the respect we garnered from the community, but Saturday’s ceremony cemented it. Our impact cannot be questioned, and our support and success are all but assured if we keep up this pace.

Thanks to anyone who showed up to the event, as well as those who watched live on Ustream, where the event can still be viewed. Your interest and enthusiasm meant the world to us.

Here’s to another great year!

NOTE: This was written via the WordPress app on my Android phone. As such it’s tricky to verify spelling and create appropriate links right now. When I have time to edit from a computer I’ll review it and correct these issues.

EDIT: I’ve now gone ahead and made my adjustments including links and spelling verifications. Should be in better shape now.

http://www.skeptic.com/
Tagged , , , ,